A very compelling article, but while I don't question the facts you gave, the whole article was written in quite a biased style. A good read none the less.
Quantity certainly doesn't mean quality when it comes to these reports. Lotsa fluff and glaring errors make this sort of thing a punchline, and more than a bit disturbing.
Why is it that every time someone realizes the U.S. government declares war on a country, or supports a country, is actually due to political and ultimately more than likely corporate greed, as the government is the puppet of corporations, do U.S. citizens not demand an investigation of their own government? This is sometimes done a bit by demanding justification, but justification can be be any old excuse, and excuses can even be artificially created. Of course anyone with morals can easily correctly deal with excuses, and put them in their place. The U.S. government and all those greedy interests which surround it need to be put in place. Probably the Industrial Military Complex in this case, but many other companies are effected as well by these kinds of decisions.
Is BP that stupid? Talk about creating an even bigger PR nightmare! Even if they are 'good', people will hate BP even more. I don't get that.
I show the military spending figure for 2011 at 758 Billion. Where did they get 1.6 Trillion?
Quantity certainly doesn't mean quality when it comes to these reports. Lotsa fluff and glaring errors make this sort of thing a punchline, and more than a bit disturbing.
Pages