I really don't understand why women should NOT own firearms. I've shot with quite a few over the years; neither sex nor gender are a hindrance to putting rounds on target.
Sad to say but it seems more women then men are targets of rape. I can think of no better treatment for rapists than high velocity lead therapy. Used correctly, there's a zero chance of recidivism.
I believe guns are important for hunting game we eat, but guns are not to be used to promote health and cancer prevention. We can see past the facade of pink ribbons and realize pink guns do not prevent cancer or domestic violence. Steve the shrink
Nevermind the fact that so much money raised for "breast cancer awareness" is actually contributed towards research and/or education, you're concerned because a very marketable TOOL is being used to raise funds, and because you perceive the only use of this TOOL to be for murder, you don't think it should be help contribute funding to something you seem to view as an admirable cause? Lady, you need to get your priorities straight. Here's an idea for you though. If you don't want to own this gun (or any other gun for that matter), DON'T BUY ONE! Just leave everybody else alone to make up their own minds about it.
Just so you know, Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my guns have. So has breast cancer.
Most women who learn to shoot do so so they can shoot men. Women use the "gun" for defense against those who use knives, guns, bats, rope, and many other devises to harm women. Look at the big picture, people harm people guns don't do anything people don't make them do. They are simply a tool to be used for good and sometimes evil.
Breast awareness is always a good thing.
I really don't understand why women should NOT own firearms. I've shot with quite a few over the years; neither sex nor gender are a hindrance to putting rounds on target.
Sad to say but it seems more women then men are targets of rape. I can think of no better treatment for rapists than high velocity lead therapy. Used correctly, there's a zero chance of recidivism.
I believe guns are important for hunting game we eat, but guns are not to be used to promote health and cancer prevention. We can see past the facade of pink ribbons and realize pink guns do not prevent cancer or domestic violence. Steve the shrink
Nevermind the fact that so much money raised for "breast cancer awareness" is actually contributed towards research and/or education, you're concerned because a very marketable TOOL is being used to raise funds, and because you perceive the only use of this TOOL to be for murder, you don't think it should be help contribute funding to something you seem to view as an admirable cause? Lady, you need to get your priorities straight. Here's an idea for you though. If you don't want to own this gun (or any other gun for that matter), DON'T BUY ONE! Just leave everybody else alone to make up their own minds about it.
Just so you know, Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my guns have. So has breast cancer.
Most women who learn to shoot do so so they can shoot men. Women use the "gun" for defense against those who use knives, guns, bats, rope, and many other devises to harm women. Look at the big picture, people harm people guns don't do anything people don't make them do. They are simply a tool to be used for good and sometimes evil.
Pages