Recent comments

  • Reply to: "Gasland" Movie Explosive for Drilling Industry   14 years 1 month ago

    Way to go Josh for all your work to make Gasland !!! My story...

    www.alkalizeforhealth.net/Lnaturalgas.htm

  • Reply to: Eat, Prey, Spend   14 years 1 month ago
    I have read the original novel and i now i am very happy to see its filmic version. after going thorough the novel we do feel how important true love is to get true happiness in life. Julia Robert is my favorite actress and i cant wait to see this movie over this weekend. I bet Sony wont loose money on this deal
  • Reply to: Will the NAIC Be a Hero for Consumers, or Insurers?   14 years 2 months ago

    i do believe that the NAIC is the only chance consumers have for fair treatment by insurers. Too bad for consumers. Again.

  • Reply to: Everything's Okay in the Gulf -- Or Is It?   14 years 2 months ago
    Only 20 Exon Valdez! Wow that sure is good news. Heck the people of the gulf coast were more than happy to dump 50 in the Niger delta, and another 30 in the amazon. I guess it's a good thing that those who bare a disproportionate responsibly get to see what makes there big ol' suv's go vroom! Maybe they might stop dumping so much oil in the Niger, or the amazon. Heck maybe they will stop trying to still oil from Persian gulf nations like Iraq and Iran even. Nah that is *way* to much to ask for.
  • Reply to: Lessons Learned From Tobacco Control Should be Applied to Climate Policy   14 years 2 months ago
    I don't really understand the comparison here, or maybe it should be the other way around. The difference in level of complication and provability between these two issues is astronomical, and it takes a great deal of ignorance to draw these kind of conclusions based on politically infulenced bodies like IPC. The same scientific ignorance resulted in promoting smoking as healthy back in the day, and is promoting Co2 as a main climate change driver these days. There is no other comparison. Climate change is far to complicated to be understood at this point, and basing decisions of HUGE economical impact (especially on 3-rd world countries) on GMC predictions (it's computer modeling) that are completely detached from reality, is a monstrosity under the white clothes of saving the environment. We don't understand the sun activity, we don't understand how clouds work, greenhouse effect is proven wrong time and time again. And what? Ignorance is bliss. My hands are dropping when I hear/read such ignorant articles

Pages