1. Horowitz's mortual attack on Zinn only underscores the frailty and self-perceived vulnerability of Horowitz's own phony, illusionist politics.
For a pundit of the diminutive stature of Horowitz to call Zinn "fringe" -- in spite of "millions of" readers -- is pathetic.
2. What's even more pathetic is that Non-Public Radio had to kiss their sponsors' "ring" and "balance" Zinn's merits with mendacious, corporatist propaganda just in order to be allowed to run a deservedly laudatory obituary of the visionary and progressive Zinn.
Just another emphatic testament to the deep, medieval distortions permeating all of American public discourse and social/political consciousness.
No not everyone opting to watch television via over-the-air signals is poor. I chose to drop pay-television due to increasing bills, declining service and poor-quality programming. Though a rediscovery of local stations with local issues and programming that appeals to the local market place we have actually began to enjoy television again.and our bank accounts have improved.
I am not sure who wants to end OTA broadcast, is it the networks seeking more direct control of programming, the pay-for-broadcast services hoping to stay profitable with less quality or a group which I have yet to identify?
If you wish to sway people, do so with a rational appeal, not some red herring-ish straw-man. You can't title your dumb article about the evils of cigarette companies as having anything to do with health care. Tort reform with respect to tobacco is entirely separate from tort reform in the context of health care provider negligence. stop messing up my google search. you're an idiot.
Over the past 10 years I have noticed that npr is leaving out a lot of news reports that are very important, and they are increasingly allowing deliberate disinformation to be presented by people like Horowitz during the recent obituary for howard Zinn. Also allowing the American Enterprise Institute to speak without counterbalance of truth. Is that because of some of the financial contributors beginning to have some weigh-in on what information is presented? I fear that may be the case. PB
1. Horowitz's mortual attack on Zinn only underscores the frailty and self-perceived vulnerability of Horowitz's own phony, illusionist politics.
For a pundit of the diminutive stature of Horowitz to call Zinn "fringe" -- in spite of "millions of" readers -- is pathetic.
2. What's even more pathetic is that Non-Public Radio had to kiss their sponsors' "ring" and "balance" Zinn's merits with mendacious, corporatist propaganda just in order to be allowed to run a deservedly laudatory obituary of the visionary and progressive Zinn.
Just another emphatic testament to the deep, medieval distortions permeating all of American public discourse and social/political consciousness.
No not everyone opting to watch television via over-the-air signals is poor. I chose to drop pay-television due to increasing bills, declining service and poor-quality programming. Though a rediscovery of local stations with local issues and programming that appeals to the local market place we have actually began to enjoy television again.and our bank accounts have improved.
I am not sure who wants to end OTA broadcast, is it the networks seeking more direct control of programming, the pay-for-broadcast services hoping to stay profitable with less quality or a group which I have yet to identify?
your guidelines are good and should be permanently displayed....
harish@back pain exercises and stretches
Over the past 10 years I have noticed that npr is leaving out a lot of news reports that are very important, and they are increasingly allowing deliberate disinformation to be presented by people like Horowitz during the recent obituary for howard Zinn. Also allowing the American Enterprise Institute to speak without counterbalance of truth. Is that because of some of the financial contributors beginning to have some weigh-in on what information is presented? I fear that may be the case. PB
Pages