Recent comments

  • Reply to: Wendell Potter to Congress: Go Ahead, Please Make Our Day   15 years 2 months ago
    Why doesn't the government reform insurance companies instead and let healthcare be healthcare again? Or maybe they should regulate the pharmaceutical industry? What?! No WAY!? WHY? Because they all have their hands in each other's pockets!
  • Reply to: Wendell Potter to Congress: Go Ahead, Please Make Our Day   15 years 2 months ago
    Dear Wendell - Thank you for speaking out on this issue. I have worked in managed care for over 6 years now in varied positions. What my professional experiences in managed care have taught me is that yes, it is all about the bottom line no matter if it is a for profit or a non-profit. We are in need of desperate overhaul of our current system which is so complicated to all parties involved. Consumer Driven healthcare is a complete debacle. I too once was forced into such a plan. My premiums still went up and at the end of the day, it did nothing more for promoting my health and wellbeing. I ended up not going to the doctor at all because nothing was covered. At any rate, I hope you read this e-mail. I would love to join your efforts somehow. I have so many ideas in terms of fixing healthcare but have no mechanism to do so.
  • Reply to: Wendell Potter to Congress: Go Ahead, Please Make Our Day   15 years 2 months ago
    I heard Mr. Potter's story about going to his home town in Tennesee and seeing the "third world" scene as ordinary people tried to get some health care. Coincidentally, and not to pick on Tenn, I had just Googled "what if I lose my health benefits" and in the large amount of empty hits that amounted to "give us your money and we'll give you an unpredictable product" I found a column from a paper in Chatanooga where the writer was helpfully explaining that Walgreen's offered monthly (or biweekly?) blood pressure checks, etc to the unemployed. I appreciate the great job some of Congress is trying to do on health care reform. I dread the results the Senate will come up with. So many say this is a complicated issue -- it really isn't. Why should Americans have to beg around the back door to be covered for health care while our government trades with our tax money and in some cases directly aids with our tax money in countries that have better access to health care than we do? And the elected officials who carry out these policies are covered by health plans paid for by the US taxpayer, of course. The principle of risk, on which private insurance is based, is fundamentally incompatible with the uncertainties of human health, and therefore private insurance is fundamentally incompatible as the primary source of health coverage, which is why this model has been abandoned in every other country that's tried it. As a secondary source, private insurance is extremely important and is available in all countries that have national universal health coverage (that's why I hate the term "single payer" -- it sounds like there's only one choice which is both misleading to Americans and also is not consistent with the choice Americans value). The public must drive the public health system in this country. Privately driven public health doesn't work -- we're living with the results. I can't emphasize strongly enough how critical I think it is that we come up with a serious, expensive national advertising and PR campaign NOW, through the summer, that counteracts the adversaries' talking points. It's so easy! No, it isn't true that a public option would limit choice. No, it isn't true it would cost more - we already speand twice as much as the next country behind us on health spending. No it won't mean health care is "rationed" -- what are we doing now, telling Americans they can't get care? But we'll spend more on prevention and less on massively interventional procedures in the last two weeks of life. No it doesn't kill innovation -- the latest research in medical innovation out of Wales (corneal transplants) and Australia (nanotechnology for cancer treatment) prove this. Real innovation will be rewarded with profit here, as it is elsewhere. Explain exactly where our health care spending goes now -- post the names of the CEOs in Big Health Care and the profits they've made this year. Compare costs with other high-GNP countries like Canada and Britain and ourselves. Run an ad showing a woman like the President's mother, ill, trying to spend as much time as she can on the phone with an insurance company that's arguing with her about saving her life. Run an ad showing a family that finds out that saving a loved one's life is going to cost them their savings and put them into bankruptcy. Run an ad showing a young person who has a hospital bill and has to decide not to return to school in order to pay it. Yes, jobs in health care will be lost. Buildings full of billing staff (maybe me, too -- I'm a medical coder) and legions of administrators, three out of four in every American hospital are there ONLY for third-party payer issues, will learn to do something else -- these may be good jobs, but most of them don't exist anywhere else because they're built on the unique excesses and redundancies of our health system. And not to be hyperbolic, but essentially these jobs are built on the traffic in human suffering. And at least these displaced workers will have health coverage while they re-train. Let's get one of our best ad agencies on this now. Right now. It's going to be a difficult summer. Thanks, Mr. Potter.
  • Reply to: Honduras Tries for a PR Coup   15 years 2 months ago

    In any clash between executive and legislative branches of government, the legislative branch is always right.

  • Reply to: Wendell Potter to Congress: Go Ahead, Please Make Our Day   15 years 2 months ago
    True in that the HC insurance companies are forcing us into some crazy plans but at the same time, Govt. healthcare is not a good idea. Governments are well known for fudging up most everything and if they are running the show on our healthplans you can't expect it to go well...I expect we'd end up like the Canadians or English with only the rich being able to afford care at all. At least with the private plans we get some decent coverage vs. what the avarage citizen in Canada or the UK gets. Reform is needed, no doubt, but the Govt. needs to set the stage and regulate and let private companies work the details. If we let them run it god help us. "Abandon All Hope Ye Who Enter Here"

Pages