Recent comments

  • Reply to: President Obama and Congress: If You Missed Wise County, Join Me in L.A.   15 years 1 month ago
    <blockquote>Maybe you should ask a vet that has used veteran's hospital...</blockquote> So you'd prefer to find yourself completely on you own if you were a wounded or disabled veteran, without at least the option of a veteran's hospital and other veterans' services? You served your country, remember? <blockquote>...or how about the post office that is constantly in the red...</blockquote> So you'd prefer to do without a postal service and leave it to chance that some private service would consider your needs profitable enough for them to notice your existence? <blockquote>We should never fear our government nor be controlled by it, government should fear its people and by controlled by the people.</blockquote> Nice idea, except for the Golden Rule: "He who has the gold makes the rules." And that increasingly means corporations making the rules for government -- how could you not notice that if you're so concerned with pork? -- and for you and me, either through government or directly. This miserable for-profit health insurance system, and the way the industry is pulling out all the stops in the fight over reform, is but one fine example of that. <blockquote>So I guess making profit is bad, and a government that confiscates our money is good?</blockquote> Depends on what you profit from, and how -- standing between sick people and needed health care and gouging those people for every last cent isn't my idea of right livelihood. And I don't know about you, but protection from dependence a system like that is one thing I'd be glad to pay taxes for. <blockquote>Oh well, I'm already classified as a terrorist because I dare speak out against an out-of-control socialist leaning government!</blockquote> Not in the least. Only wingnuts are so over-the-top about "terrorism." <blockquote>Well, if just property owners voted, maybe votes couldn't be bought or bussed in...o-o-o-ps, did I say that out loud?</blockquote> The cheese stands alone.
  • Reply to: Big Insurance, Big Tobacco and You   15 years 1 month ago
    The Lewin Group...owned by a major healthcare player is NOT a third-party organization without any corporate ties. It is all about corporate ties. Investigate that, rather/instead of trying to refute their nonsense. The truth is what will set us free.
  • Reply to: An Open Letter to Nancy-Ann DeParle   15 years 1 month ago
    Mr. Potter, I applaud your efforts on behalf of the CMD and would like your thoughts on one solution that's been <i>entirely</i> overlooked amidst the healthcare reform debate: Employers eliminating the managed care middleman and contracting <b>directly</b> with doctors and hospitals. For the past 15 years, I've been working with major self-insured employers, negotiating direct agreements between those employers and medical providers as an alternative to conventional PPO networks. Coincidentally, one of my largest clients, a company with over 40,000 covered lives, was with Cigna when they opted to develop their own direct networks instead of using Cigna's PPO networks. With direct networks now across 14 states, my client's medical trend has been essentially flat for the past 9 years, while companies their size suffered increases of 10% or more each and every year. This client's employer-owned networks, built upon fair "win-win" agreements, are stable and well-liked by providers. Compare that to the openly contentious and adversarial relationships you and I know exist in virtually every commercial PPO network. The huge savings this particular employer has achieved by having its own direct networks for the past 9 years has allowed it to maintain a relatively rich medical benefits plan, with low deductibles and without shifting costs onto employees. Incidentally, this employer uses a third party administrator (TPA) to process its claims according to the reimbursement and contractual terms of the direct agreements, as well as the UR, pre-cert, and case-management components. In this case, the TPA works for the client, and has no middleman loss-ratio to protect, so the admin costs are a fraction of what they run with Cigna. I invite you to peruse the articles about the success of this approach that appeared in the WSJ, Business Insurance, Employee Benefits Review, and the Kiplinger Letter. Many of these are available at my website, <a href="http://www.ajlester.com">AJLester.com</a>.com, in the <a href="http://www.ajlester.com/public_html/resource_newsroom.htm">Resource Center-Newsroom</a>. For years, managed care companies have disdained my efforts to help employers bypass PPO networks by contracting directly with providers. Even Cigna tried to dissuade my client from developing their own networks, a story I'll share with you off-line, if you're interested. Unfortunately, the insurance companies have done such a bullet-proof job as middlemen, that most doctors and employers believe there is no other way for them to do business with each other than through a managed care company. Ironically, the very first people that my prospective clients consult with about the idea of direct contracting is....you guessed it, their insurance company. Coming from Cigna, I'm sure you know how quickly employers can be talked out of <i>that</i> idea. So, notwithstanding your background as a managed care guy, what are your thoughts about employers cutting out the middleman and contracting directly with doctors and hospitals? Shouldn't it be promoted as an alternative to commercial PPO networks? It's still a "private-payer" approach, which should appease opponents of the "public option". But the private part of it <i>really</i> is private. That is, between the employer as buyer and the medical provider as seller, without need of a middleman. Lastly, is anyone else you know talking about this approach? If not, why not? If it's because no one thinks it'll work, where is that message coming from? There are companies out there, albeit not a huge number, who can tell a compelling story about the success of this approach. Is it possible to get people to listen? Many thanks in advance for whatever insights you can lend. BTW, I just put up my own blog to comment more on this issue: <a href="http://www.ajlesterblog.blogspot.com">AJ Lester's Blog</a>
  • Reply to: Big Insurance, Big Tobacco and You   15 years 1 month ago
    I subscribe to emails from both sides of the debate, and when I got one from Newsmax asking for donations for the "The League of American Voters," I used the Google. And found nothing in the first 30 listings that was from this group itself. Anyone know who this group might be, and where they get their funding?
  • Reply to: President Obama and Congress: If You Missed Wise County, Join Me in L.A.   15 years 1 month ago
    Please. Other commenters have already cited services our government performs well. Repeating that tired mantra gets you nothing. Maybe you should ask a vet that has used veteran's hospital, or how about the post office that is constantly in the red, the billions of pork...no thank you, I don't need any more of that kind of government. Let me be clear, government isn't bad, as long as it is kept in check by the true sovereign, the people. We should never fear our govenment nor be controlled by it, government should fear its people and by controlled by the people. Um...women, people who don't own property, and black people voting? Well, if just property owners voted, maybe votes couldn't be bought or bussed in...o-o-o-ps, did I say that out loud? I'm not choosing sides here, both sides of the isle are guilty. On the contrary, there can be no real reform as long as we're stuck with this for-profit "baby." It, not government, ought to be "drowned in the bathtub." So I guess making profit is bad, and a government that confiscates our money is good? Wow... no wonder this country is in the shape its in! Oh well, I'm already classified as a terrorist because I dare speak out against an out-of-control socialist leaning government!

Pages