Recent comments

  • Reply to: Wendell Potter: Baucus' Health Care Bill Needs Urgent Care   14 years 12 months ago
    Don't be too sure that if everyone who wants it...could purchase Medicare, will solve the current problems. Here is a recent article from NoQuarterUSA.net: Total Medicare claims denied in one year: 475,566 The entire report can be viewed here: AMA 2008 National Health Insurer Report Card Again, I am all for reform. And it is up to the American people to decide on what type of reform is best. But what I don’t like is misinformation, and un-truthfulness. When people bring up their concerns about a Government takeover of health care, or rationing, or the dreaded death panels, they are scoffed at. Yet, looking at the Medicare denial rates, they deny more patients then seven top commercial health insurers. So, perhaps the next time Obama puts down private insurance companies for denying claims, or scoffs at those concerned about rationing, or being denied under a public option, someone can point out to him that Medicare is one of, if not the worst, offender? And while they are busy denying coverage to thousands of people, Medicare is running around willy-nilly overspending by the hundreds of millions of dollars. According to their own auditors, Medicare knowingly overpays for almost everything it buys. Examples include: – $7,215 to rent an oxygen concentrator, when the purchase price is $600. – $4,018 for a standard wheelchair, while the private sector pays $1,048. – $1,825 for a hospital bed, compared to an Internet price of $1,071. – $3,335 for a respiratory pump, versus an advertised price of $1,987. – $82 for a diabetic supply kit, instead of a $47 price on the Web. Last year, the Health and Human Services Department tried to replace its archaic fixed-price fee schedule for 10 commonly purchased products with a competitive bidding program in 10 cities. The department said the program could save Medicare $125 million in a single year, or $1 billion if adopted nationwide. But Congress stepped in to stop it. But Congress stepped in to block it….
  • Reply to: Medical Malpractice in the Health Care Debate: Sucking Us Back Into the "Tort Reform" Bog?   14 years 12 months ago
    Screw the Patient Reform has been enacted in over 30 states and it hasn't made one little damn bit of difference. MALPRACTICE DAMAGE CAPS NOT A CURE FOR HIGH HEALTH CARE COSTS An in depth Dallas Morning New investigation of Texas tort reform. http://tinyurl.com/DallasMalpracticeReport TRUTH ABOUT HEALTH CARE AND TORT REFORM - Part I http://preview.tinyurl.com/TortReform Part1 explains that “tort reform” — an idea being pushed by conservatives as the cure for many economic problems, including high health care costs — has never delivered the promised results, yet conservatives keep making the promises. Part II http://tinyurl.com/TortReform2 documents how a cabal of extremely wealthy individuals and family trusts has been able to manipulate public opinion to sell “tort reform” to the public. Part III looks at arguments being made in favor of tort reform and shows that they are mostly distortions, misrepresentation , and lies. Part 4 http://tinyurl.com/TortReform4 Discusses the rights and protections citizens lose because of “tort reform.” THE MYTH OF THE FRIVOLOUS LAWSUIT http://news.lawreader.com/ REPORT DEBUNKS RIGHT WING PROPAGANDA THAT HIGH HEALTH COSTS ARE BEING CAUSED BY MALPRACTICE SUITS http://tinyurl.com/MalPracticeReport
  • Reply to: Medical Malpractice in the Health Care Debate: Sucking Us Back Into the "Tort Reform" Bog?   15 years 2 hours ago
    Thank you for your thoughtful piece on "the big lie" known as tort reform. My question of the so-called tort reformers has always been and will continue to be (until I get a thoughtful answer) this: If you are really serious about limiting the amount of "frivolous lawsuits" being filed, why is your remedy of choice always caps on serious ones? "Frivolous lawsuits" are, by definition, worthless. Those who bring them could be sanctioned or fined (although I fail to understand why any lawyer working on a contingency fee would pursue "frivolous" litigation). Capping serious verdicts for serious injuries at unreasonably low numbers will only make the public sector responsible for that which the private sector (insurance companies) have received record profits in premiums for: the risk of a claim or verdict for a serious injury. Tort reform is the first corporate bailout; insurance companies receive a free pass on paying serious damages in injury cases, leaving the taxpayers to foot the difference. Personal injury damages are an ultimate safety tool. Restricting damages in injury cases make us less safe. Thanks again for this excellent piece. May I share it with others?
  • Reply to: Wendell Potter: Baucus' Health Care Bill Needs Urgent Care   15 years 20 hours ago
    How funny, Mr. Potter had no problem padding his pocket for 20 years with that evil insurance company money. Now he readily attacks this industry. Wonder how much money you are being paid here on the light side (since supposedly insurance companies are the dark side). Anyone who advocates government run healthcare, obviously has never lived under it. I wonder what kind of healthcare insurance Mr. Potter has now and if he would give that up for the public option. I would bet not.
  • Reply to: Medical Malpractice in the Health Care Debate: Sucking Us Back Into the "Tort Reform" Bog?   15 years 1 day ago
    ...Has anyone suggested a public option for medical malpractice insurance? :-(

Pages