News Articles By

The continuing saga of the Pentagon pundit program just keeps getting curiouser and curiouser, as Alice in Wonderland might say.

From 2002 to 2008, the Defense Department secretly cultivated more than 70 retired military officers who frequently serve as media commentators. Initially, the goal was to use them as "message force multipliers," to bolster the Bush administration's Iraq War sell job. That went so well that the covert program to shape U.S. public opinion -- an illegal effort, by any reasonable reading of the law -- was expanded to spin everything from then-Defense Secretary Rumsfeld's job performance to U.S. military operations in Afghanistan to the Guantanamo Bay detention center to warrantless wiretapping.

In April 2008, shortly after the New York Times first reported on the Pentagon's pundits -- an in-depth exposé that recently won the Times' David Barstow his second Pulitzer Prize -- the Pentagon suspended the program. In January 2009, the Defense Department Inspector General's office released a report claiming "there was an 'insufficient basis' to conclude that the program had violated laws." Representative Paul Hodes, one of the program's many Congressional critics, called the Inspector General's report "a whitewash."

Now, it seems as though the Pentagon agrees.

Thanks to everyone who responded to last month's funding appeal. Our Center for Media and Democracy has been hit very hard by the recession. Donations from individuals and foundations, our lifeblood, are down significantly. As a result, we've been forced to cut back our staffing. CMD needs your support to keep our work alive and well. Only a small fraction of the 25,000 people who receive our Weekly Spin actually contribute money to support our work. Please, be one of them. If you haven't given yet, do so now by clicking here and contributing online. Please, show you care and give now.

Recently the Wisconsin Network for Peace and Justice asked me to write an article for them with my ideas of how grassroots activists could better use the Internet for real change. As a member of the group, I was happy to tackle that assignment, and here are my thoughts.

Barack Obama owes his election in no small part to his brilliant use of social networking websites, email, cell phone texting and blogs, all utilized in unprecedented ways by his campaign staff to promote, organize and fund his unlikely victory. He employed techniques pioneered by online groups such as MoveOn and took them to an entirely new level. Thanks to Obama's use of the Internet, politics in America will never be the same. It's crucial that peace and social justice activists at the state and local levels understand and harness these new technologies in organizing for fundamental social change.

I can't say it much plainer than this: Help! Our Center for Media and Democracy needs your support to keep our work alive and well. Many of you reading this appeal have assumed that others have been lending a hand, but we need your support as well. Please give now by clicking and contributing online here.

Our unique reporting and propaganda-busting at PR Watch and SourceWatch is not free; it just seems that way. We must raise more than a half-million dollars a year to support our work. We do it while refusing grants from political parties, government agencies, labor unions and corporations, in order to preserve our independence. Our work depends on individuals like you, and on a small number of grants from non-profit foundations.

Right now, we're hurting. This brutal recession has devastated the giving ability of individuals and foundations alike, and our income is showing the effects. We are a lean organization, and I can assure you that there is NO fat that we can trim at this point -- cuts are going to the bone.

Whether you have given to our work recently or not at all, please give now. We fully intend to survive this global economic unraveling and come back stronger than ever, but we can only do it with your support. Please, show you care and give now.