The law does have an exception included that states:
b) An exercise of a person's right of free speech or assembly that is otherwise
7lawful.
Am I missing something?
I agree that this story is very unfair and as biased as you accuse center square of being. I freelance for the site, covering hard news in Arizona and Nevada and I can recall no directives from my assigning editors to skew any pieces in a conservative direction. Objectivity is the goal and so far my only mandate has been to present both sides of issues fairly. Maybe pr watch should take another look and determine where any bias exists? I can't find it.
Couldn't agree with you more, Deborah. COS is a non-partisan organization. Democrats and Republicans alike support COS. EVERYONE, except the politicians themselves, wants term limits.
I thought this Organization was gathering Applications for an ARTICLE V Convention in order to make Amendments to the Constitution for the purpose of addressing Federal Government Over-reach, rein in the out-of-control government Spending, and impose Term Limits on Elected positions including SCOTUS. That's not a Constitutional Convention! Sounds like a great plan to me. Time to get rid of the deadbeat Reps who are making $$ from insider information & doing nothing to address issues like Immigration, & the partisan SCOTUS who is delegating our rights to illegal Departments that make rules & regulations instead of making Congress do it's job & actually make laws. "The real threat to our constitutional rights today is posed not by an Article V Convention of States, but by an out-of-control federal government, exercising powers that it does not have and abusing powers that it does." Sounds like they are closing some Loopholes! Both sides need to Stop Telling Me What To Do & get to work.
Pages