Recent comments

The need for a Federal "repository for high level nuclear waste" is a last ditch effort by anti-nukes. I read an article called "There is no such thing as nuclear waste" and was impressed that France has no need for storing nuclearwastes - they reprocess and continue using the fuel until there isn't any radiation to speak of still left to worry about. And as for high costs, those costs can easily produce sub 5 cents per kilowatthhour power or less. Nuclear fuel costs are running at less than .4 cents per kilowatthour and the charge to ensure plenty of funding for decommissioning is less than .2 cents per kilowatthour. I notice that no one is funding the decomissioning of windmills or solar farms. Apparently those 80,000 ton blocks of base concrete will remain there forever. Wisconsin has a reputation of being fraidycats and cowards about just about everything. I hope they don't build a nuclear plant and try to use wind power. You'll get just what you deserve. Vermont has plenty of nuclear and some hydroelectric andthey produce just 5 pounds of carbon per megawatthour of power produced. I see that filthy Wisconsin produces 1925 pounds (!!!!!) of carbon dioxide per megawatthour, making it far and away one of the dirtiest emitters on the planet. India and China are far cleaner. Shame, Wisconsin, shame. And you jerks are worried about nuclear waste storage!!!!!

But unfortunately, our current funding is very limited for even our core, existing projects. CMD is not in a position at this time to take on a large added expense like that, regardless of what a good cause or idea it is.

Judith Siers-Poisson
Development Director